Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks do not generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence happened in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie websites that are streaming where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either this was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever dealing with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of cash. He is a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, this is certainly one worker whom keeps his equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a really quiet man. He just walked in really calmly with an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of the two tales is just a bit more terrifying, as the axe was wielded not during the slots, but at a person in the staff at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with some cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm in the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate utilizing the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of cash,’ plus the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up on the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every and each of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate option is pertaining to the idea that neighboring communities is afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos ought to be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, is one of the handful of prospects who have recommended that most of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that would be positioned in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it might have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in just one community,’ Conley stated throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but receive none of the proposed benefits.’
In line with the state laws that produced the chance of three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate compensation, with arbitration needed if the gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t arrived at an answer on their own.
Conley has proposed going for a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power throughout the whole vote. In other terms, the casino might have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city royal vegas nz login in an effort to be authorized.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% were in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii as the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is a competing proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the sports book cookie jar after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired premier recreations betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a many gambling outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the local roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with wagering shops and cash advance businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public places and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for a politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back in the corner for the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna reported that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance with all the guidelines and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is no longer a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group implies that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a entirely innocent contribution or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party that are searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this type of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in his regional constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he truly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ reported Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is thought to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this present year his workplace was accused of editing their Wikipedia page to show evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.